Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

Authors

  • Nikmarocha Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Dwi Juniati Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Pradnyo Wijayanti Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2024.9.2.94-109

Keywords:

Cognitive style, Contextual problems, Relational thinking

Abstract

This study aims to describe the relational thinking profile of students with field independent and field dependent cognitive styles in solving contextual problems. There are seven study groups in class VII MTsN 1 Surabaya City and two male students from class VIIA totaling 40 students were selected as subjects based on the results of the GEFT cognitive style test and equivalent mathematical ability. Students who got a GEFT score ≤ 9 were classified as field dependent (SFD) and field independent (SFI) got a score > 9. Subjects with field independent cognitive style (SFI) were selected with a score of 11, subjects with field dependent cognitive style (SFD) with a score of 7 with TKM results, namely 77 and 82. Data collection techniques in this study used TPM and interviews. Data analysis was carried out by means of data reduction, presentation and conclusion drawing. Valid data obtained through time triangulation. The results showed that in understanding the problem, (1) SFI and FFD students found important elements in a given problem. Learners SFI describes the relationship between the elements in the problem while students SFD can not explain. Learners FI and FD build relationships in determining the completion planning strategy and checking again using arithmetic operations and carrying out the plan made. Learners FI solves the problem using another method while learners FD uses the usual way. Learners FI do the recalculation while students SFD counts back by way of substitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab, J. S., Margono, G., & Rahayu, W. (2019). The Logical Thinking Ability: Mathematical Disposition and Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012092. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012092

Chu, Y. C. (2008). Learning Difficulties in Genetics and The Development of Related Attitudes in Taiwanese Junior High Schools [Thesis, University of Glasgow]. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2624722

Chumairoh, L., Rahmawati, A., & Asriningsih, T. M. (2022). Analisis Pengajuan Soal Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.1.102-112

Clarke, D., & Roche, A. (2018). Using contextualized tasks to engage students in meaningful and worthwhile mathematics learning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.006

Demirel, M., Derman, I., & Karagedik, E. (2015). A Study on the Relationship between Reflective Thinking Skills towards Problem Solving and Attitudes towards Mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2086–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.326

Hoogland, K., Pepin, B., Bakker, A., de Koning, J., & Gravemeijer, K. (2016). Representing contextual mathematical problems in descriptive or depictive form: Design of an instrument and validation of its uses. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.005

Irawaan, A. (2015). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Numerik dan Penguasaan Konsep Matematika terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritik Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v4i1.138

Kepner, M. D., & Neimark, E. D. (1984). Test–Retest Reliability and Differential Patterns of Score Change on the Group Embedded Figures Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1405–1413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1405

Kliziene, I., Paskovske, A., Cizauskas, G., Augustiniene, A., Simonaitiene, B., & Kubiliunas, R. (2022). The Impact of Achievements in Mathematics on Cognitive Ability in Primary School. Brain Sciences, 12(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060736

Komariyah, S., & Laili, A. F. N. (2018). Pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap hasil belajar matematika. JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Matematika), 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v4i2.523

Kose, N. Y., & Kızıltoprak, A. (2020). Development of Secondary School Students’ Relational Thinking Skills with a Teaching Experiment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), Article 85. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/52308/685456

Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464

Mohammed, P. A. K., & Jassim, A. P. D. B. M. (2021). Forward-Thinking And Its Relationship with Decision-Making Skills of The Middle School Mathematics Teachers. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i13.9511

Monroe, E., & Panchyshyn, R. (2020). Helping Children with Words in Word Problems. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 10(4), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.199310614571996

Ningsih, P. O., Harsono, H., & Wulandari, M. D. (2024). Strategic Factors that Influence Critical Thinking Ability in Mathematics Learning in Elementary Schools. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v14i1.21427

Penny, M. D., & White, W., G. Jr. (1998). Developmental Mathematics Students’ Performance: Impact Of Faculty And Student Characteristics - Proquest. Journal of Developmental Education, 22(2), 2–12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ584345

Pithers, R. T. (2002). Cognitive learning style: A review of the field dependent-field independent approach. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 54(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820200200191

Polya, G. (2014). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. United States: Princeton University Press.

Romadhoni, A. R. I., Farida, N., & Suwanti, V. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Knisley untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konseptual Siswa. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 7(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.2.180-191

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajaran. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational Understanding dan Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.12.2.0088

Soedjadi, R. (2007). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Konstatasi Keadaan.

Solso, R. L. (with Internet Archive). (1995). Cognitive psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. http://archive.org/details/cognitivepsychol00sols_0

Stephens, M. (2006). Describing and exploring the power of relational thinking. Mathematics Education Group of Australia, 29(2), 479–286. https://slideplayer.com/slide/3932361/

Suharnan, P. (2005). Psikologi Kognitif. Surabaya: Srikandi.

Sujatno, A. (2012). Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Surya, E., Putri, F. A., & Mukhtar. (2017). Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Confidence of High School Students through Contextual Learning Model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85–94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1173627

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. Psychological Issues, 51, 1–141. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7012884/

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Nikmarocha, Dwi Juniati, & Pradnyo Wijayanti. (2024). Analisis Profil Berpikir Relasional Peserta Didik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 9(2), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2024.9.2.94-109

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.