Level of Students' Mathematical Literacy Based on Cognitive Conceptual Tempo (Reflective-Impulsive)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2024.9.1.1-19Keywords:
Mathematical Literacy, Cognitive Style, Conceptual Tempo, Reflective, ImpulsiveAbstract
This research aims to describe students' mathematical literacy abilities based on their cognitive conceptual tempo. The research method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive approach. The research was conducted at SMKN 1 Ngasem in class XI-2 Design, Modeling, and Building Information. Data collection techniques in this research involved the use of tests and interviews. The tests were divided into two parts: the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT) to gather data on students' cognitive styles (conceptual tempo) and a mathematical literacy test to assess the level of mathematical literacy abilities of the students. The results of this research indicate that reflective subjects were able to achieve a mathematical literacy level of 3 for S1 and level 4 for S2. Reflective students fall within the medium scale. Meanwhile, impulsive subjects achieved mathematical literacy indicators at level 1 and level 4 for S3, and level 1, level 3, and level 4 for S4. Impulsive students also fall within the medium scale. Furthermore, future researchers can explore more extensive mathematical literacy content and contexts.
Downloads
References
Alafif, S. P., & Swastika, A. (2023). Analysis of mathematical literacy ability of class XI students on arithmetic sequences and series in solving HOTS problems reviewed from cognitive styles. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2886(1). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/2886/1/020036/2914434
Anif, S., Prayitno, H. J., Sari, D. P., & Adnan, M. (2023). The ability of mathematical literacy in elementary school students based on cognitive style. 6th International Conference of Combinatorics, Graph Theory, and Network Topology (ICCGANT 2022), 107–119. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iccgant-22/125986141
Ariyanto, L., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2022). Minimum competency assessment design to improve mathematical literacy in junior high schools. KnE Social Sciences, 64–75.
Aufa, N., & Manoy, J. T. (2022). Student’s mathematical literacy in solving asesmen kompetensi minimum question in terms of gender. MATHEdunesa, 11(1), 219–229.
Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design. ECTJ, 26(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766370
Azhil, I. M., Ernawati, A., & Lutfianto, Moch. (2017). Profil pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif [Profile of students' mathematical problem-solving based on reflective and impulsive cognitive styles]. JRPM, 2(1), 60–68.
Barstis, S. W., & Ford Jr, L. H. (1977). Reflection-impulsivity, conservation, and the development of ability to control cognitive tempo. Child Development, 953–959.
Bush, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1975). Reflections on conceptual tempo: Relationship between cognitive style and performance as a function of task characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 11(5), 567.
Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity, and creative performance: the importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21514
Chen, A. (2015). Operationalizing physical literacy for learners: Embodying the motivation to move. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 125–131.
Colwell, J., & Enderson, M. C. (2016). “When I hear literacy”: Using pre-service teachers’ perceptions of mathematical literacy to inform program changes in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 63–74.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Damayanti, A. P., Juniati, D., & Susanah. (2021). Literasi matematik siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal model pisa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif-impulsif [The mathematical literacy of students in solving PISA model problems in terms of reflective-impulsive cognitive styles]. Math Didactic, 7(2), 101–113.
Denney, D. R. (1972). Modeling effects upon conceptual style and cognitive tempo. Child Development, 105–119.
Dian, D., Ahmad, C. F., & Arsal, F. R. (2023). Implication and application mbkm’s curriculum in education (madrasah and universities). At-Ta’dib, 18(1), 106–122.
Fitriyani, H., Setyawan, F., Hendroanto, A., & Istihapsari, V. (2021). Describing student’s mathematical power: Do cognitive styles make any difference. Bulletin of Applied Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 39.
Gabriel, F., Buckley, S., & Barthakur, A. (2020). The impact of mathematics anxiety on self-regulated learning and mathematical literacy. Australian Journal of Education, 64(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120947881
Gabriel, F., Signolet, J., & Westwell, M. (2018). A machine learning approach to investigating the effects of mathematics dispositions on mathematical literacy. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(3), 306–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1301916
Genc, M., & Erbas, A. K. (2019). Secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of mathematical literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(3), 222–237.
Goodenough, D. R., & Witkin, H. A. (1977). Origins of the field‐dependent and field‐independent cognitive styles. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1977(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1977.tb01134.x
Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1998). [No title found]. Human Relations, 51(7), 847–871. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016978926688
Holenstein, M., Bruckmaier, G., & Grob, A. (2021). Transfer effects of mathematical literacy: An integrative longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00491-4
Hwang, J., & Ham, Y. (2021). Relationship between mathematical literacy and opportunity to learn with different types of mathematical tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 199–222.
Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., & Phillips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes.
Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78(1), 1.
Karmila. (2017). Deskripsi kemampuan literasi matematis siswa ditinjau dari gender [Description of students' mathematical literacy skills in terms of gender.]. Pedagogy, 3(1), 126–155.
Khang, A., Jadhav, B., & Birajdar, S. (2023). Industry revolution 4.0: workforce competency models and designs. In designing workforce management systems for industry 4.0 (pp. 11–34). CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003357070-2/industry-revolution-4-0-alex-khang-babasaheb-jadhav-sphurti-birajdar
Lan, W., Repman, J., & Chyung, S.-Y. (1998). Effects of practicing self-monitoring of mathematical problem-solving heuristics on impulsive and reflective college students’ heuristics knowledge and problem-solving ability. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67(1), 32–52.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979809598343
Larkin, T., & Budny, D. (2005). Learning styles in the classroom: Approaches to enhance student motivation and learning. 2005 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, F4D-1. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1560310/
Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). The effects of learning strategies on mathematical literacy: a comparison between lower and higher achieving countries. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 306–321.
Maslihah, S., Waluya, S. B., Karomah, N., & Iqbal, K. (2021). Increasing mathematical literacy ability and learning independence through problem-based learning model with realistic mathematic education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042123. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042123/meta
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Najma, L. A. Z., & Masduki, M. (2023). Exploration of student algebraic thinking in terms of implusive reflective cognitive style. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 7(2), 219–231.
O’Connor, G. E., & Kabadayi, S. (2020). Examining antecedents of health insurance literacy: the role of locus of control, cognitive style, and financial knowledge. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54(1), 227–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12266
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/b25efab8-en
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Ozgen, K. (2013). An analysis of high school students’ mathematical literacy self-efficacy beliefs in relation to their learning styles. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0030-4
Pabbajah, M., Abdullah, I., Widyanti, R. N., Jubba, H., & Alim, N. (2020). Student demoralization in education:The industrialization of university curriculum in 4.0.Era Indonesia. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1779506. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1779506
Pratikno, Y., Hermawan, E., & Arifin, A. L. (2022). Human resource ‘kurikulum merdeka’from design to implementation in the school: what worked and what not in indonesian education. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 326–343.
Pratiwi, D. A., Trapsilasiwi, D., Oktavianingtyas, E., & Sunardi. (2019). Level literasi metamatika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa konten change and relationship berdasarkan gaya kognitif [The level of students' mathematical literacy in solving PISA content change and relationship problems based on cognitive styles]. Kadikma, 10(3).
Purwanti, A. F., Mutrofin, & Alfarisi, R. (2021). Analisis literasi matematika ditinjau dari kecerdasaan matematis-logis siswa [Analysis of mathematical literacy in terms of students' mathematical-logical intelligence]. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 40–57.
Rahayu, Y. A., & Winarso, W. (2018). Berpikir kritis siswa dalam penyelesaian matematika ditinjau dari perbedaan tipe gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif [Students' critical thinking in mathematics problem-solving viewed through the differences in cognitive styles, specifically reflective and impulsive]. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 1–11.
Reskiah, Rahman, A., & Dassa, A. (2015). Profil berpikir reflektif siswa dalam pemecahan masalah aljabar ditinjau dari gaya kognitif pada siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Wonomulyo Sulbar [Profile of reflective thinking in algebra problem-solving based on cognitive styles in 8th-grade students at SMP Negeri 5 Wonomulyo, West Sulawesi]. Jurnal Uncp, 03(1), 138–146.
Rulandari, N. (2021). Study of sustainable development goals (SDGS) quality education in Indonesia in the first three years. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2702–2708.
Sari, E. K., Sugiyanti, & Pramasdyahsari, A. S. (2021). Profil kemampuan literasi matematis siswa berkemampuan matematika tinggi dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita berbasis PISA [Profile of mathematical literacy skills in high-ability students solving PISA-based story problems]. Jurnal Gantang, VI(1), 83–92.
Sholikin, N. W., Sujarwo, I., & Abdussakir. (2022). Penerapan teori belajar bermakna untuk meningkatkan literasi matematis siswa kelas X [Implementation of meaningful learning theory to enhance mathematical literacy in 10th-grade students]. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 06(01), 386–396.
Smirnov, E. I., Tikhomirov, S. A., & Abaturova, V. S. (2021). The phenomenon of complex knowledge in teaching mathematics as a factor of mathematical literacy forming of school students. Перспективы Науки и Образования Perspectives of Science and Education, 286.
Soemantri, S. (2018). Pengaruh gaya kognitif konseptual tempo terhadap tingkat kesalahan siswa [The influence of conceptual tempo cognitive style on students' error rates]. Didaktis: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 18(1).
Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). The evolution and key concepts of the PISA mathematics frameworks. In Assessing mathematical literacy (pp. 5–33). Springer.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52(7), 700.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 1–21). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781410605986-1&type=chapterpdf
Tariq, V. N., Qualter, P., Roberts, S., Appleby, Y., & Barnes, L. (2013). Mathematical literacy in undergraduates: Role of gender, emotional intelligence and emotional self-efficacy. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(8), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.770087
Taufik, A. R., & Zainab, N. (2021). Mathematical literacy of students in solving PISA-like problems based on cognitive styles of field-dependent and field-independent. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042080. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042080/meta
Van Woerkom, M. (2004). The concept of critical reflection and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422304263328
Wahyuni, D. (2023). The effect of language literacy and numerical literacy on the result of the minimum competency assessment (AKM) of SMAN Ploso Jombang. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(1), 225–237.
Wahyuningsih, S., Sani, A., & Sudia, M. (2019). Analisis proses berpikir siswa smp dalam memecahkan masalah matematik ditinjau dari gaya kognitif dan gender [Analysis of junior high school students' thought processes in solving mathematical problems in terms of cognitive styles and gender]. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, 4(1), 121–132.
Witkin, H. A. (1967). A cognitive‐style approach to cross‐cultural research1. International Journal of Psychology, 2(4), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207596708247220
Wulan, E. R., & Astuti, F. (2022). Mathematical literacy with islamic nuances based on prospective mathematics teachers’ personality. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 9(2), 230–247.
Yahya, S., & Goh, W.-K. (2002). Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 457–468.
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. Handbook of Intelligence, 581–610.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pamiati Oktavia Sari, Eka Resti Wulan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
