Online Learning at Secondary Schools: Listening to Pre-Service Teachers in Their Teaching Practices

Authors

  • Luluk Isnainiyah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Fitriah Fitriah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2022.11.1.100-109

Abstract

Coronavirus has altered how students are educated and how teachers conduct themselves in the classroom. The changes have compelled educators to shift their primary focus to remote learning or online instruction. Teachers are expected to innovate and digitize learning in order to address the current situation. This study aims to explore pre-service teachers’ perceptions of online learning at secondary schools within an EFL context. The study interviewed five pre-service teachers who had completed teaching practicum at secondary schools as part of their education. The findings indicated that online learning encourages pre-service teachers to access resources from a variety of sources, to exercise their creativity by searching for something different, to expand their knowledge, and to teach with greater flexibility. Although the study discovered positive attitudes toward online learning, these pre-service teachers encountered difficulties in implementing it, including a lack of discipline, slow responses, technical difficulties, and an insufficient internet connection. The study emphasizes how online education encourages pre-service teachers to be more creative in their material selection and professional development. They should, however, ensure that their practice is effective and efficient in reaching out to students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the

conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological

pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52(1), 154–168.

Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & A, L. (2012). Understanding the Implications of Online

Learning for Educational Productivity. Washington: Office of Educational Technology US

Department of Education.

Cakrawati, L. M. (2017). Students' perceptions on the use of online learning platforms in EFL

classroom. English Language Teaching and Technology Journal, 1(1), 22 - 30

Coyle, Y., Yañez, L., & Verdú, M. (2010). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on the teacher

and children’s language use in an ESL immersion classroom. System, 38(4), 614–625.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

method approaches (5th ed.). New York: SAGE Publications.

Dvir, N., & Schatz-Oppenheimer, O. (2020). Novice teachers in a changing reality. European

Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 639–656.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge,

confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3),

–284.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). New York: SAGE Publications.

Hjeltnes, T. &. (2004). Cost efficiency and cost-effectiveness in e-learning. Quis- Quality,

Interoperability and Standards in e-learning. Trondheim, Norway: TISIP Research Foundation.

Higgins, K., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., & Crawford, L. (2019). Effects of Technology in Mathematics

on Achievement, Motivation, and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing

Research, 57(2), 283–319.

Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). COVID-19 and schooling: evaluation, assessment and

accountability in times of crises—reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy, practice and

research with the school barometer. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,

(2), 237–270.

Ishlaiwa, F. (2016). Factors influencing faculty participation in e-learning: The case of Jordan

(Doctoral Dissertation)

Levin, D. (1997). Institutional concerns: Supporting the use of Internet discussion groups. Paper

presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication,

Phoenix, AZ.

Orlov, G., McKee, D., Berry, J., Boyle, A., DiCiccio, T., Ransom, T., Rees-Jones, A., & Stoye, J.

(2021). Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: It is no who you teach, but how you teach.

Economic Letters, 202(1), 1–5.

Paulsen, M. F. (2003). Online Education and Learning Management Systems. Bekkestua, Norway:

NKI Forlaget.

Pedaste, M., & Kasemets, M. (2021). Challenges in organising online conferences. Educational

Technology & Society, 24(1), 92–104.

Rochyani Lestiyanawati, A. W. (2020). Strategies and Problems Faced by Indonesian Teachers in

Conducting ELearning System During COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Culture, Literature,

Linguistics and English Teaching, 2(1), 71-82.

Setyawan, C. (2020). Challenges on teaching online English subject in SMK Negeri 1 Nawangan

Spoel, D. V. I., Noroozi, O., Schuurink, E., & Ginkel, V. S. (2020). Teachers’ online teaching

expectations and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. European

Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 623–638.

Sun, L., Tang, Y., & Zuo, W. (2020). Coronavirus pushes education online. Washington: Nat.

Mater

Zhang, L. J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’

knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 320–353.

https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352

Downloads

Published

2022-07-31

How to Cite

Isnainiyah, L. and Fitriah, F. (2022) “Online Learning at Secondary Schools: Listening to Pre-Service Teachers in Their Teaching Practices”, IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 11(1), pp. 100–109. doi: 10.15642/ijet2.2022.11.1.100-109.

Issue

Section

Articles