Designing Culturally-Responsive ELT Materials: A Framework For Integrating Local Wisdom While Maintaining CEFR Standards

Authors

  • M. Hanin Fahmi UIN Walisongo Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2025.14.2.241-256

Keywords:

culturally-responsive teaching, ELT materials development, local wisdom, Javanese culture, design framework

Abstract

The dominance of Western-centered materials for English Language Teaching (ELT) in Indonesia leads to the disconnection between language instruction and students' cultural identity, which may pose a threat to their motivation and cultural heritage. This Design-Based Research is aimed at the development and evaluation of a framework for creation of culturally responsive materials for ELT that incorporate local wisdom of Java and meet CEFR requirements for Grade 10 students. A teaching unit on Hamemayu Hayuning Bawana (Javanese environmental philosophy) was developed through multiple iterations of expert validation, teachers' consultations, and modification of the framework. The materials were evaluated by three experts in materials development and three experts in local culture through rubrics modified from Tomlinson (2013) and Banks and Banks (2010). The results revealed the high level of pedagogical quality (87.6%) and cultural authenticity (91.9%) of the materials and their full correspondence to Gay's (2010) frameworks of culturally responsive teaching and CEFR A2-B1 descriptors. Five design principles were established: Authentic Integration, Progressive Scaffolding, Balanced Representation, Student Agency, and Standards Alignment. It is shown that local wisdom and CEFR standards do not have to be considered as contradictory concepts and can be effectively combined. The proposed validated framework is intended for use by materials developers in creation of culturally sustainable ELT materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, R. C. (2004). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 594-606). International Reading Association.

Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163-206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066

Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (2010). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (7th ed.). Wiley.

Bose, P., & Gao, X. (2022). Cultural representations in Indian English language teaching textbooks. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082102

Braun, V., Clarke, V. & Weate, P. (2016). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In B. Smith & A. C. Sparkes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 191-205). London: Routledge.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative

competence. Multilingual Matters.

Canagarajah, S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice.

Routledge.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the

EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching

and learning (pp. 196-219). Cambridge University Press.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

Derakhshan, A., Khalili, A. N., & Beheshti, F. (2021). Should textbook images be merely decorative?: Cultural representations in the Iranian EFL national textbook from the semiotic approach perspective. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821992264

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice

(2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

Harwood, N. (Ed.). (2014). English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production. Palgrave Macmillan.

Keles, U., & Yazan, B. (2023). Representation of cultures and communities in a global ELT textbook: A diachronic content analysis. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 582-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820976922

Kim, D. (2020). Learning language, learning culture: Teaching language to the whole student. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 519-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936693

Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing. Routledge.

Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 55–72). New York, NY: Routledge.

McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers: Practice and theory. Bloomsbury.

McGrath, I. (2016). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching (2nd

ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd

ed.). Routledge.

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.

Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge.

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25-44). SAGE.

Salih, A. A., & Omar, L. I. (2021). Globalized English and users' intercultural awareness: Implications for internationalization of higher education. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/20471734211037660

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.

Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2013). Developing principled frameworks for materials development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 95-118). Bloomsbury.

Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Wiley Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Fahmi, M. H. (2025) “Designing Culturally-Responsive ELT Materials: A Framework For Integrating Local Wisdom While Maintaining CEFR Standards”, IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 14(2), pp. 241–256. doi: 10.15642/ijet2.2025.14.2.241-256.

Issue

Section

Articles