An Analysis Minimal Exchange Structures and General Exchange Structure in English Classroom Interaction Found in Youtube

Authors

  • Regina Marintan Silalahi Nommensen HKBP University
  • Kammer Tuahman Sipayung Nommensen HKBP University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2021.10.2.228-254

Keywords:

analysis, exchange structure, classroom interaction

Abstract

Abstract. This research reported study about analysis minimal exchange structures and general exchange structure in English classroom interaction found in you tube, (from mujikuy channel : asking and giving information about berbasis ganre in x class). This study direct to analysis the element of minimal exchange structures and general exchanges structures in English classroom interaction find in you tube. The data is the clauses obtained from conversation among teacher and students of X grade during English classroom learning process that find in you tube from (Mujikuy channel : asking and giving information about berbasis ganre in x class). This study uses theory of Halliday (1994) by qualitative descriptive method. The result shows that there are three (3) types of act as the element of exchange structures: Initiating, Responding,and Following-Up (I-R-F). Minimal exchange structure consists of: Initiating-Responding (I-R) or Initiating-Responding-Following Up (I-R-F). General structure of exchange in classroom situation consists of: greeting, giving order, giving information, asking question, and closing. In the learning process, things do not always go well. When the learning process students sometimes do not respond to conversations or instructions given by the teacher. Therefore teachers must take initiatives such as providing information, asking questions, and giving instructions. So that the learning process becomes more efficient. This study shows that the teacher has the authority to regulate learning activities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaei, M. (2016). A study of ideational metafunction in Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”: A critical discourse analysis. Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Brown, H. (2010). Exchange structure in the modern classroom: “Jamie’s Dream School”. University of Nottingham.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Pearson Education International.

Derry, S. J. (2007). Guides for video research in education. National Science Foundation (NSF).

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Tanya Stabler.

Ginting, S. A. (2010). Sistem dan struktur percakapan dalam bahasa Karo (Disertasi). Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Ginting, S. A. (2015). Structure of Karonese conversation in the funeral: Case study in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 11(13), Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Text as semantic choice in social context. Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). University of Sydney.

Rafsanjani, R. F., & Mirahayani, N. K. (2018). Classroom communicative structure: Exchange structure in EFL class in Public Senior High School 3 Mojokerto. Anaphora: Journal of Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 9–11.

Saragih, A. (2004). Introducing functional grammar. Universitas Negeri Medan (UNIMED).

Saragih, A. (2014). Discourse analysis: A study on discourse based on systemic functional linguistic theory. Universitas Negeri Medan (UNIMED).

Shalehodin. (2016). “Move” analysis in classroom interaction. Journal Anglo-Saxon, 7(1). University of Riau Kepulauan.

Sipayung, T. K., & Pangaribuan, T. (2019). Developing teaching materials on English for specific purposes on tourism program of HKBP grade eleven. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 23(6), 95.

Sipayung, T. K. (2016). Metafunction realization on students’ descriptive paragraph. International Journal of Linguistics, 23.

Sitorus, N., & Silitonga, H. (2018). The implementation of direct method to improve students’ ability in speaking. ELTIN Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 6(2), 79–84.

Sunardi. (2016). English curriculum genre: Pedagogic negotiation patterns in the Indonesian EFL classroom. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(6).

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.

Yu, W. (2009). An analysis of college English classroom discourse. Qingdao University of Science and Technology.

Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2025, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com

SSRN. (n.d.). [Paper on SSRN]. Retrieved April 21, 2025, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2768579&download=yes

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Silalahi, R. M. and Sipayung, K. T. (2021) “An Analysis Minimal Exchange Structures and General Exchange Structure in English Classroom Interaction Found in Youtube”, IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 10(2), pp. 228–254. doi: 10.15642/ijet2.2021.10.2.228-254.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.