Promoting the Use of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to Evaluate ESP Textbooks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2025.14.1.37-51Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), English for Specific Purposes (ESP), Textbook EvaluationAbstract
Since English has become a professional and communication language in various domains in Indonesia, it is necessary to take into consideration a variety of English used in specific domains, which is called English for Specific Purposes (ESP). To accommodate the instructional material, ELT textbooks have a vital role due to their authority to strengthen teachers’ identity. By employing critical discourse analysis (CDA), teachers can critically evaluate ESP textbooks to ensure they are not just linguistically correct but also culturally sensitive, professionally relevant, and ideologically sound, thereby improving the overall efficacy of ESP instruction. Thus, it is believed that ESP textbook evaluation using CDA is an important thing to do. This article aims at promoting CDA to evaluate textbooks especially ESP. This approach fosters continuous improvement in teaching practices and curriculum development, ultimately enhancing the educational experience for learners in specialized fields. This paper provides the readers with detail explanations about the importance of textbook evaluation, the basic concepts of CDA, the roles of CDA in evaluating ESP textbooks and steps in evaluating ESP textbooks using CDA. In this paper, suggestions and recommendations are also offered to the ESP teachers, students, stakeholders, policymakers, and curriculum developers to use CDA to evaluate ESP textbooks.
Downloads
References
Al Ghazali, F. (2007). Critical discourse analysis: How can awareness of CDA influence teaching techniques? TESOL Arabia.
Al Ghazali, F. (2017). Awareness of critical discourse analysis underpins learners’ sociolinguistic competence and language use. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 349–366.
Ali, S. (2011). Critical language awareness in pedagogic context. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 28–35.
Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for specific purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351031189
Arslan, S. (2016). An analysis of two Turkish EFL books in terms of cultural aspects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 217–225.
Boston, J. M. (2002). How to get away with things with words: An examination of written text (Doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.
Brown, J. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Heinle & Heinle.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. X. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 196–219). Cambridge University Press.
Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. Heinemann.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.
Dudley-Evans, T. (2001). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In R. M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219–228). Routledge.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36
Fajardo-Dack, T. (2016). Teacher disempowerment in the education system of Ecuador. World Journal of Education, 6(3), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n3p82
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Trans.). Lawrence and Wishart.
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.4.315
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy and the knowledge wars of the twenty-first century. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 1(1), 1–22.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Evaluating the English textbooks for young learners. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 79–83.
Knight, K. (2022). English for specific purposes project leader profiles: The leadership communication of 55 ESP project leaders. Candlin & Mynard ePublishing.
Kress, G. (1993). Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 169–191.
Liu, Y., & Hu, G. (2021). Mapping the field of English for specific purposes (1980–2018): A co-citation analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.003
McGrath, I. (2016). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
Mukundan, J., & Kalajahi, S. (2013). Evaluation of Malaysian English language teaching textbooks. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 1(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.1n.1p.38
Nasution, S., et al. (2020). Using critical discourse analysis to explore an authentic teaching material: A focus on language and power. Studies in English Language Education, 7(2), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16636
Nilsson, K., & Horvat, A. (2018). An analysis of Swedish EFL textbooks: Reflections on cultural content and English as an international language [Project report]. Malmö University.
Noor, P., & Angrum, A. T. (2024). An analysis of culture in selected English textbooks for junior high school. Intensive Journal, 7(April).
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Prentice Hall.
O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.2.104
Rahimi, E., & Sharififar, M. (2015). Critical discourse analysis and its implication in English language teaching: A case study of political text. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 504–511.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2017). Curriculum development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024556
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP today: Practitioner’s guide. Prentice Hall.
Salamah, U. (2014). Gender representation in the English textbook (A content analysis of “Bright” for seventh grade student published by Erlangga). [Unpublished master’s thesis].
Setyono, B., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). The representation of multicultural values in the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture-endorsed EFL textbook: A critical discourse analysis. Intercultural Education, 30(4), 383–397.
Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: A reappraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the art (pp. 1–13). SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Tallapessy, A., Wahyuningsih, I., & Anjasari, R. A. (2020). Postcolonial discourse in Coogler’s Black Panther: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Humaniora, 35(1), 75–87.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 269–278). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024778
Victor, M. (1999). Learning English in Gabon: The question of cultural content. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 12(1), 23–30.
